Market-based or Government control Issues surrounding ObamaCare Research Paper

Market- ground or Government control Issues meet ObamaCare - Research Paper ExampleCritics labeled PPACA as ?bamaCareto contraryiate it from other alternative solutions to Americas diverse health wish problems, such as a fully nationalized health care musical arrangement and improving the current market-based health care system (Shi & Singh, 2007, p.ix). This paper seeks to explore the issues surrounding PPACA. A number of authors argued against PPCA, because they assert that it is a socialist intervention that does not fit the market-run socio-economic model of modern society and it is a costly and unconstitutional infringement on private choices and corporate rights. ObamaCare is fundamentally socialist and does not fit into the market-run socio-economic model of modern society. Williamson (2011) described PPACA as ?ocialist,because it is based on a ?entral preparation model,with socialist features of ?ncome-redistribution, economic leveling, the co-opting and nationalization of private enterprises, and the elevation of an elite planning class(p.237). He did not believe that a socialist model can resolve the underlying issues of full(prenominal) medical and insurance costs in the nation, and for him, it testament only replicate the 1970s British healthcare issues of poor implementation and poor results. Sultz and Young (2008) highlighted the characteristics of American healthcare that evade an effective socialization process. First, the healthcare system is too large to be managed by the state alone ?he U.S. health care system is the worlds eight largest economy, second to that of France, and is larger than the total economy of Italy(p.xvii). Second, the healthcare system is too complex, because of its labour-intensive levels and the changing, varied roles of healthcare professionals and employees who interact with evolving medical technology and patient preferences (Sultz & Young, 2008, p.xvii). Sultz and Young (2008) argued that the size and complex ity of the American healthcare system shaped problems of limited health care access, inconsistent quality, and increasing costs (p.xviii).They evince that nowadays, the system is more driven by the market than state policies, which only reflects underlying socio-economic paradigms, and so a socialist response to it will not be effective. Shi and Singh (2007) even described the healthcare system as not a system, because it is enormously fragmented. It is ?ragmented because different people obtain health care through different means(p.2). Since it is not even a system, a socialist system will overly not take in to improve access to it, as well as reduce costs and inequalities. Several sources asserted that Obamacare will not resolve the American healthcare systems weaknesses, because it takes away singular choices through strong government interventions. telamon (2010) argued that ObamaCare is flawed, because it predominantly eliminates individual choices by enforcing state cont rol. He stressed that ?bamaCare... audaciously imposes a strong-armed federal government onto perhaps the most personal of all segments of American life(p.2). He believed that ObamaCare will only reduce individual choices and he hinted that this may have an impact on the ?uperior medical carethat Americans can access now (p.2). Shi and Singh (2007) also did not agree with ObamaCare, because it manifests the growing government control over peoples lives. They stressed that around fifty per centum of the American public opposed ObamaCare, becaus